« Bugzilla Issues Index
#2215 — odd formatting of Notes
- bug_id:
2215
- creation_ts:
2013-11-10 12:48:00 -0800
- short_desc:
odd formatting of Notes
- delta_ts:
2015-02-19 19:11:10 -0800
- product:
Draft for 6th Edition
- component:
editorial issue
- version:
Rev 23: April 5, 2014 Draft
- rep_platform:
All
- op_sys:
All
- bug_status:
RESOLVED
- resolution:
FIXED
- priority:
Normal
- bug_severity:
minor
- everconfirmed:
true
- reporter:
Michael Dyck
- assigned_to:
Allen Wirfs-Brock
- commentid:
6630
- comment_count:
0
- who:
Michael Dyck
- bug_when:
2013-11-10 12:48:27 -0800
Usually, the spec formats Notes like paragraphs, with all lines flush-left.
But in:
12.4.4.1 Static Semantics: Early Errors
12.13.5.1 Static Semantics: Early Errors
13.6.4.1 Static Semantics: Early Errors
each has a Note where:
(a) the word "NOTE" is slightly indented; and
(b) subsequent lines are significantly indented.
(Of course, in 12.4.4.1, the second line is code, so indenting it is fine, but the third line should be flush-left.)
- commentid:
6646
- comment_count:
1
- who:
Allen Wirfs-Brock
- bug_when:
2013-11-10 17:15:51 -0800
fixed in rev22 editor's draft
- commentid:
6986
- comment_count:
2
- who:
Michael Dyck
- bug_when:
2014-01-21 13:19:26 -0800
No, these are all the same in rev22.
- commentid:
7107
- comment_count:
3
- who:
Allen Wirfs-Brock
- bug_when:
2014-01-27 10:05:45 -0800
fixed in Rev22 (January 20, 2013) release
- commentid:
7156
- comment_count:
4
- who:
Michael Dyck
- bug_when:
2014-01-29 12:57:23 -0800
No really, these aren't fixed in rev22.
- commentid:
7614
- comment_count:
5
- who:
Michael Dyck
- bug_when:
2014-04-06 21:33:59 -0700
Still not fixed in rev 23.
Section numbers are now: 12.5.4.1, 12.14.5.1, 13.6.4.1
- commentid:
7621
- comment_count:
6
- who:
Allen Wirfs-Brock
- bug_when:
2014-04-07 09:20:04 -0700
I'm now thinking that I prefer the indented style. I think I may switch all notes to that style, if I can get the Ecma style police to go along.
- commentid:
7630
- comment_count:
7
- who:
Michael Dyck
- bug_when:
2014-04-09 11:59:09 -0700
In that case, please revisit Bug 1237.
- commentid:
12810
- comment_count:
8
- who:
Michael Dyck
- bug_when:
2015-02-17 08:17:41 -0800
In rev 33, the anomalies are still present in 12.5.4.1 and 13.6.4.1.
(The latter is just a one-line Note, so it only has anomaly (a).)
- commentid:
12929
- comment_count:
9
- who:
Allen Wirfs-Brock
- bug_when:
2015-02-18 14:46:21 -0800
fixed 12.5.4.1 and 13.6.4.1 in rev34 editor's draft
- commentid:
13155
- comment_count:
10
- who:
Allen Wirfs-Brock
- bug_when:
2015-02-19 19:11:10 -0800
fixed in rev34