« Bugzilla Issues Index

#476 — Is "ordinary ECMAScript object" redundant?

Given the definition of "ordinary object" in 4.3:

"object that has the default behaviour for the internal methods that must be supported by all ECMAScript objects."

Perhaps all extant occurrences of "ordinary ECMAScript object" should be simplified to "ordinary object"

I only found one occurence to "ordinary ECMAScript object" and removed the ECMAScript

fixed in rev10 editor's draft

fixed in rev10, Sept. 27 2012 draft