Section 8.7 The List and Record Specification Type
(1) "aggrations" -> "aggregations"
(2) "specifation" -> "specification"
(3) "the ECMAScript type value" -> "an ECMAScript type value"
(4) "a an" -> "an"
(5) "assocatiated" -> "associated"
(6) "in double brackets. For example, [[value]]" -> "in double brackets, for example [[field1]]."
(7) "fields three fields each of why" -> "three fields, each of which"
(8) "[[Field2]]" -> "[[field2]]"
(9) rename "D" to "r", three times
(10) "commonly used Record field combination" -> "commonly used Record field combinations"
(11) "named and" -> "named, and"
(12) "aggrations -> "aggregations" (yes, again)
(13) "[[Configurable]]: true}" -> "[[Configurable]]: true}."
corrected in editor's draft
fixed in rev10, Sept. 27 2012 draft
Checked in rev 26 draft:
(1)-(5), (8)-(13) verified as fixed.
(6) The period at the end of the paragraph is still missing, and "field1" seems more appropriate in this context than "value".
(7) The comma after "three fields" is still missing.
fixed in rev30 editor's draft
fixed in rev30
Verified in rev 32 draft.